Love at the time of Tinder: are dating apps making Londoners more lonely?

by Valerio Esposito

London is a city where it’s easy – almost inevitable – to feel lonely. In such a fast-moving environment it is becoming increasingly difficult to connect with other people. You see it every day: your co-worker is leaving for a better job, your neighbour is moving out because the rent is too high and the girl who made your morning coffee moved back to her country.

It’s a city of 9 million people, and yet it’s never enough to ease your misery: everyone is too caught up in their daily drama to care about others, to even realise that they’re there. And at the end of the day, you crawl into an empty bed and search for the easy solution on the screen of your phone, trying to find comfort in yet another dating app.

A recent survey[1] conducted by tech start-up Wonderush showed that 64 per cent of Londoners feel lonely on a daily basis. Of those surveyed, 65 % attributed their loneliness to the demands of their job, while 42 % said that London itself is the main cause.

Loneliness is a tricky concept: it can be social or emotional, the latter being more damaging. Research suggests that the feeling of loneliness does not arise from the lack of company, but rather the lack of emotionally fulfilling connections. Just try to take a train in the city and look around: not a whisper, or a smile or even innocent eye contact. We are like flies in a web, permanently alone, helplessly disconnected.

But are dating apps making it worse? It sure is difficult – almost impossible – to form meaningful relationships just by playing a little game with the thumb: swipe left, swipe right. Ugly and hot. Good and bad. The selection mechanisms have never been so simple – and ruthless. People have become bidimensional exchange goods, with no depth: their worth is established by the movement of a merciless finger.

”I’ve tried Tinder but it didn’t work. I found that fast mechanism of ‘consumption’ degrading and impoverishing. This model makes it impossible to develop a relationship,” comments retail worker Fiorina, 36. “You can’t keep up with it, you’re always greedy and you can’t focus on what’s in front of you because you’re impatient to see what’s next.”

Julia Keller, love coach and author of Attract Authentic Love, attributes this to our “incapability to communicate with each other. Some say that dating apps were invented because we lost this ability. Or maybe they made us lose this ability. It’s a chicken and egg kind of situation, hard to tell”.

We are a selfish generation and yet we live in the senseless effort to project ourselves onto others. That new pair of shoes, that stylish haircut, that rejuvenating cream and the new red lipstick. Why do we do it, if not to make ourselves more appealing – or tolerable – to others? This is just one of the many faces of this business called love.

Dating apps are perhaps the newest – and most insidious – degeneration of this business. It’s no surprise that people’s approach towards relationships has become increasingly business-like. Student Aara Syed, 19, explains how she felt that “dating apps might be a way to tick a box: boyfriend sorted. People might feel that way because it’s so easy to meet people and have many options. But it doesn’t work like that”.

The truth is that, most of the times, dating apps create a demand by exploiting basic needs: human contact – and affection. They claim to sell a solution: if you can’t find the one, they’ll do it for you. ”We’ve lost the notion of process. We don’t take the time to solve the problem but we just move on to the next things. And that’s why we are constantly dissatisfied. And constantly lonely,” Keller adds.

In the meantime, it seems as dating apps try to convince you that what you want is easy to get; and you end up wanting more – and faster. It’s a scam, a palliative. It offers relief but it doesn’t heal people’s brokenness.

Yes, technology is breaking us. We don’t work the way we used to. ‘’How do you even meet people in the real world?’’ is a question that I have heard countless times. I usually answer with another question: ”How did your parents meet?”

Julia Keller argues that ”It’s a completely different world than it was the time of our parents. People are confused and busy. The world is becoming much more superficial and we find ways to make love faster and easier and this leads to a lot of disappointments”.

Indeed, things have changed. Millennials are the main victims, for they were born in the era of dating apps and might not even know that they have an alternative. Jekaterina Drozdovica, 20, a student in London, explains how “what were normal human interactions are now considered abnormal. Especially in London, If I just went to a bar and started a conversation with a stranger it would be considered… creepy”.

We got to the point where starting a conversation in a train or in a pub has become weird. But, ironically, sending and receiving ”dick pics” and other obscenities is more tolerable.

Maybe it’s true: the world has changed and dating apps have become an essential tool for human interactions. This leaves us wondering if it’s worth fighting the new system or if it’s just better try to find a way to deal with it. Aara is not sure whether dating apps should be completely demonized: ”I can’t say that they make things worse, but they clearly don’t help”.

Love Coach Keeler, on the other hand, believes that it’s all about “learning to navigate the odds. Good or bad they might be, dating apps are still a practical way to get to know people. And once you’ve met someone you just need to know the right thing to do from there”.

[1] http://blog.wonderush.com/pull-sickie-make-friend-month/

Sex robots and Kissenger: the new cyber technologies

London – by Rosita Pirulli

Sex robots and new sex mobile devices are the latest news on social networks: Kissenger is one of them.

Goldsmiths University hosted the Sex Robots Festival on 19th and 20th December in London, an exhibition banned in Malaysia because it was described as too extreme.

The conference in the English capital discussed about different themes: sex hardwares, cybersex toys and humanoid robots. It was an opportunity to argue new opinions of students and researchers and show their inventions. Among the protagonists of that cyber symposium there was Dr. Kate Devlin who said: “I think robots could become our lovers in the future.”

In fact, at the exhibition it was said that robotic sex could be normal by 2050, becoming more addictive than ever. Robots can be programmed to satisfy the needs of men and women, and above all they could never say ‘no’ because of common headaches or other physical issues. Others commented that robots could be better than humans in a sexual relationship.

Comments derived also from a sexual therapist, Dr. Gurpreet Singh: “Who are we to judge people who want to have sex with robots? Let people enjoy sex robots – they will work in the same way couples introduce a toy into a sexual relationship. And if both parties are agreed, I see nothing wrong.”

Does this mean that there will be a total substitution of humans?

Dr. Singh does not agree with the total sexual use of humanoids in our lives because: “It takes on a whole different meaning if sex robots are used because of a fear of intimacy or because a person wants to be isolated. Then the addiction needs to be addressed.”

To this statement Dr. Kate Devlin responded: “Does love have to be reciprocated in order to be valid?” In this case, ethical and legal factors should be considered as well as the psychological elements Dr. Singh mentioned.

In fact, what would happen if sentimental robots appear in the world?

Answers have not emerged yet, but other results were showed about what humanoids could offer; for instance, they could work as a substitution of prostitutes. “They do not need to fake being excited during sex and this could enforce affective bonds with clients,” Dr. John Danaher, lecturer in business at ‘NUI Galway’ University, said.

By contrast, their costs could differ from the money requested by their next rivals. At the moment, humanoids cost about £6000, but the amount could decrease, as some researches disclosed.

Indeed, for whom is curious to try similar technologies as soon as possible, Kissenger (Kiss+Messenger) could be a solution. A PhD student in Computing at City University stated that it is a new mobile device for distance relationships designed by Emma Yann Zhang; it consists of a cover for smartphones with a rubbery pad where you can send kisses to your partner during video chats; the only thing is that it does not allow the use of the tongue.

She believes that humans intimate more today with A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) than in the past and this project could enforce this bond, but it does not explain if having relationships with robots is ethically acceptable.

Kissenger is able to send kisses similar to real ones, with the same labial pressure, thanks to a study of blood and heart pressure of people invited to some lab tests.

However, this is not the end of the project. Researches are continuing to surprise the public: the next aim of Kissenger is allowing the device to build the same scent of people we want to kiss.

Subsequently, it is noticeable that there has been a progress in cyber technologies, highlighting the wonderful capabilities of humans. Whether it could bring positive or negative outcome, we do not know yet. What we know for now is that the robotic era, usually seen only on TV screens, is coming to the real world, but this era will not end as soon as fictions.