The Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British sources:
A new success at Oxford University
Oxford University – In an age when children are encouraged to pursue the useful and vocational, it may seem surprising that some researchers chose to join the difficult enterprise of completing a Latin dictionary.
This was the latest challenge of a group of researchers at Oxford University’s classics faculty, where the editor, Richard Ashdowne, and some final assistant editors succeeded into creating a Medieval Latin equivalent of the Oxford English Dictionary. The 17-volume tome, started about a century ago, in 1913 by Oxford historian Robert Whitwell, has been recently finished, drawing on more than 1,400 sources from the sixth to the 16th century, including the Domesday Book, the Magna Carta and the Bayeux tapestry, and researchers reported feeling a “huge satisfaction”. Based entirely on original research, the DMLBS is the most comprehensive dictionary of Medieval Latin to have been produced and the first ever to focus on British Medieval Latin.
«When I joined – explained the editor – the Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources (DMLBS) team as an assistant editor in 2008, it soon became clear to me that this was no ordinary research project. On my desk I found a box of slips of paper containing medieval Latin quotations, about 2,500 in number, for words sorted alphabetically starting at Scap- and running through to Scip-. There was also a pencil and a pile of further slips of paper, blank for me to complete.»
“This is the first ever comprehensive description of the vocabulary of the Latin language used in Britain and by Britons between AD 540 to 1600,” Ashdowne said. “For the last 100 years, the project has been systematically scouring the surviving British medieval Latin texts to find evidence for every word and all its meanings and usage. Much of this fundamental work was done in the early years of the project by a small army of volunteers, including historians, clergymen, and even retired soldiers; they provided the project with illustrative example quotations copied out from the original texts onto paper slips – an early form of crowd-sourcing.”
Ashdowne said there is also an aspiration to publish the entire work as a digital, open-access edition next year, adding “we haven’t got the funding yet”. He said: “It’s a difficult question to know how many people are going to use it. Fewer and fewer people know any Latin, but this means that more people will need a dictionary to know how to read it.”
The dictionary is published by the British Academy and its cost is now £600.
For further information, click on http://www.dmlbs.ox.ac.uk/ and visit http://dmlbs.wordpress.com/
A few words with Richard Ashdowne, editor of the DMLBS
Richard Ashdowne has been editor of the DMLBS since October 2011, succeeding David Howlett. Richard had previously worked for the project (since 2008) as an assistant editor, in which role he had been instrumental in developing the project’s use of technology.
His main research interests are in semantics and pragmatics, particularly with reference to forms of address, and historical linguistics and language change, especially with reference to Latin and the Romance languages.
v What talked you into joining the hard enterprise of the DMLBS?
I had recently completed my DPhil and needed a job. I saw a post as an assistant editor advertised and applied. I was quite surprised to be offered the job.
v Which has been the most difficult part of the project?
In recent years finding sufficient funding to ensure that the work of the project could continue to the end of the alphabet has been our greatest challenge. Although much of the early work in the 1920s to the 1940s was done by a large number of volunteers excerpting quotations from original sources to form a base of data from which we could work, the actual work of editing and publishing has naturally required full-time employees, and with that comes a significant financial cost. Supported throughout our history by the British Academy, nevertheless since the late 1990s we have had to compete for research funding with other arts and humanities research projects. It is indeed fortunate that we have received enough funding from the UK AHRC and the Packard Humanities Institute to see us through to the end of the alphabet.
v As a researcher, I know that passion, hard work and enthusiasm are essential ingredients of a research…but, according to you, what else?
Lexicography demands all sorts of qualities: accuracy and attention to detail, ability to work methodically, decisiveness, curiosity, intellectual flexibility, patience and tenacity tempered with pragmatism, imagination balanced by good sense.
v Your work can be compared to some important projects, conducted on Latin or classic resources, such as the Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (which I have often consulted), but it stopped at letter O. Do you think it could be possible to carry on the ThLL? Will it reach the end in the next future?
I believe the ThLL continues its work, though the world is now so very different from the world in which it began so long ago. I would not care to speculate on whether it will reach the end eventually but I have the feeling that that point may not come during my lifetime.
v Why has the technology been so important for completing the DMLBS?
Quite simply, the project would not have been completed otherwise. When editing of the dictionary began in the 1960s there was little technology that could have been of use, and the methods of compilation were little different from what would have been used a century earlier. However, by the start of the 21st century other major research dictionaries had been using electronic working methods for a decade or more and it was quite clear that we should not continue with a 19th-century method when better (i.e. more accurate, more efficient, and cheaper) ways of working were available. Adopting these improvements was one important way of bolstering the case for continued funding of the project to the end.
v The Medieval Latin has always been considered too confused, too magmatic to be studied: do you agree with this shared opinion?
No. This is a misguided and ill-informed view — I might even go so far as to say an ignorant view —, typically held by people who have never read more than a few words of the language from the period. Medieval Latin is certainly a complex thing to deal with. It was, after all, used by people in areas across the whole of Europe for everything from accounting to zoology for more than a thousand years after the fall of the Roman empire despite not being their native language, so it should come as no surprise that the language does not retain the apparent simple lack of variation within the heavily standardised classical literary language of Cicero, Caesar, Virgil, Ovid and others of their era. In fact, even in Roman times as a native language Latin exhibited considerable variation across the area over which it was spoken and changed very considerably from its earliest known forms in the first half of the first millennium BC down to the age of Cicero and beyond; indeed people nowadays still speak Latin — we simply call it Italian, French, Spanish, Romanian, etc. This is to say nothing of how that varying Latin was used differently in different functions and genres in different places at different times by different peope. Seen alongside the true complexity of Latin as a native language, the medieval Latin language emerges as similarly complex in distribution and variable in form. However, since variation is inherent in all languages this is not in itself any greater challenge for medieval Latin, and in fact the sheer volume of surviving evidence means that we are better informed than for many historical languages.
v In Italy, our relationship with the ancient languages (I don’t like calling them dead, because they aren’t dead at all), such as Latin and Greek is very strong. What about English behavior towards Latin and Greek languages?
In England (but largely not the rest of the UK) both Latin and Greek, but especially Latin, have unfortunately become widely associated with the education system within which their teaching predominantly survives, namely that of fee-paying schools; thus the study and knowledge of both languages is regularly seen as elitist, a view backed up with misguided claims about the supposed irrelevance of both languages (as compared, for instance, with the transparent relevance of English, maths, science, and IT). In fact, the availability of Latin at least is now finally enjoying something of a resurgence in the state education sector and while it remains a battle for us to enable every child who would like the opportunity to learn these languages for whatever reason to do so, there are signs that the tide is turning.
v Finally, if you were asked to sum your project up in a single word, which one would you choose?
Satisfaction. We have accomplished what our forebears set out to do.
Richard Ashdowne and the researchers involved into the DMLBS project demonstrate that diligence and the desire to succeed can make the difference and lead to very high levels. As Virgil would say: “audentes fortuna iuvat timidosque repellit” – fortune favors the bold and repels the coward.
Rashid, from Pakistan, told about the women condition in his country and about the veil as a choice for the women.
-The veil in the Oriental tradition. – The veil in the European countries. – The veil like a woman’s chose.
“I draw ispiration from classic art; I especially like the story and the
He cannot know the woman’s body and her shapes, so it will result absurd to see a woman without Burqa. We have met an Italian who Antonella, has worn the Burqa: Even in the Yemen, the woman cannot sit close to a man in the bus. Antonella used the Burqa during your travel in the Yemen because it was necessary like a protection against men’s nuisances. In the Iran the women wear the chador in public space, it is a full body length that is open down the front, it hasn’t hand opening or any buttons. Today black chador are reserved for funerals and the women prefer to use a colored chador.
But the State Council believes it’s necessary to edit the law with specific indication about the integral veil in the public areas. So actually there is an important discussion about this issue but yet there isn’t a law with specific prohibition to wear a veil in the public places. On the contrary in France, like in Belgium, a law ban the total veil in the public areas with a fine for the transgressor.